The
study of International Relations has made us know many the perspectives and
using them to understand and analyze the global events. In market world, we
know the famous perspective like mercantilism. Mercantilism said that countries
do trading simply to accumulate wealth so power could be achieved. They focused
on the cycle of war and power. But, there was Adam Smith to oppose this idea of
mercantilism.
Adam
Smith being the forerunner of liberalism with his famous term “invisible hand”
although it was just said once in his book “The
Wealth of Nation”. Adam Smith was carrying Laissez-faire as his theme in which the state should not interfere market
and its involvement in their market is very limited. They believe that market
could find and determine their own price (equilibrium) without the help of the
government. This is what “invisible hand” means. Adam Smith explained in his
book that the state’s welfare could be reached if every people pursue their own
interests. If you are a farmer, do that heartily. If you are a student, live it
diligently.
He also came with the idea of absolute
advantage that later developed by David Ricardo’s comparative advantage. In
absolute advantage, there are two countries with two commodities in which one
country picks one commodity they could produce many than the latter country.
While comparative advantage requires each country to compare two goods they can
produce in their own country in terms of efficiency before they choose what to
export and what to import. Because of that, while mercantilism believes that if
one side gains a benefit means the loss for others (zero-sum game), liberalism
chooses to see the life as a positive-sum game. In which it still possible for
each countries to gain benefit or advantage in trading even though the amount
they get is different.
To
sum it up, we can conclude that mercantilism do trading to accumulate wealth
and turn it into power so that the power can be used to produce wealth and turn
it to power again. On the other hand, liberalism believes in freedom of individual
in the marketplace to organize economic activity rather than government and
view life as a positive-sum game.
Sources:
Balaam, David. N, & Dillman, B. (2014). In Introduction to International
Political Econom. Ch.4. United Kingdom: Pearson Education
Limited.
Posted by,
Salwa Ni'matul Maula
1701315806
Posted by,
Salwa Ni'matul Maula
1701315806
No comments:
Post a Comment